Skip to main content

QTD Income Equity – 4Q2025 vs R1000V

Download Article
QTD Income Equity – 4Q2025 vs R1000

Market Observations & Portfolio Commentary

Income Equity – 4Q2025 vs Russell 1000 Value

 

Market Update

U.S. equities finished higher for a third consecutive quarter in Q4, with the Russell 3000 Index rising 2.4% and the S&P 500 posting similar gains. The quarter was supported by strong earnings growth, 50 basis points of additional Fed rate cuts, and an extension of the US-China trade truce. However, headwinds emerged from AI investment scrutiny, labor market softening with unemployment reaching a four-year high of 4.6%, and a prolonged government shutdown. The quarter reflected investors navigating between optimism around earnings strength and concerns about AI returns and macroeconomic softening.

Equity market performance was again characterized by uneven leadership beneath strong headline returns. Performance among the Magnificent 7 companies displayed growing divergence, while the high beta rally that began in April showed signs of exhaustion beginning in November. Stylistically, Value outperformed Growth across the market cap spectrum, but performance between Large and Small Cap equities was more balanced. Sector leadership was mixed. Health Care and Communication Services were the most positive, while the other Defensive sectors (Real Estate, Utilities & Consumer Staples) were negative for the quarter. Looking at market factors, Value factors were the primary driver of returns, led by stocks trading at lower prices relative to sales and book value, while cash-flow-based measures were more muted. Quality factors, which our portfolios tilt toward, were headwinds. Momentum and Volatility factors provided support; meanwhile, Growth & Yield factors were mixed.

 

Key Performance Takeaways

  • The London Company Income Equity portfolio declined 1.4%
    (-1.6% net) during the quarter vs. a 3.8% increase in the Russell 1000 Value Index. Stock selection was as headwind to relative performance, partially offset by positive sector exposure.

  • The Income Equity portfolio trailed the Value benchmark in Q4 and came up short of our 85-90% upside capture expectations. Most of the headwind for Q4 was in October, on better CPI data and rate cut expectations. Value and Volatility factors led Quality for the quarter, but Yield factors were particularly weak in October, which weighed on relative and absolute performance for Q4. Our lack of direct bank exposure proved to be a headwind for Q4 and 2025 overall. Banks nearly doubled the index’s overall return for both Q4 and 2025 as the Fed lowered short term interest rates and the yield curve steepened. Banks re-rated meaningfully higher from a multiple perspective in 2025, which could prove challenging in 2026 if valuations come under pressure.

  • Despite a challenging backdrop for Quality, Yield, and Low Volatility exposures, Income Equity finished in line with our 85-90% upside participation expectations for the year.

 

Top 3 Contributors to Relative Performance 

  • Cummins Inc. (CMI) – CMI reported strong results, driven by Power Systems strength tied to data center demand, while the on-highway truck market remains weak. There are some signs that Class 8 deliveries are nearing a bottom. CMI remains one of the few global suppliers capable of supporting large-scale data center backup power requirements. As the market leader in heavy-duty diesel engines, CMI’s diversified business mix, strong competitive positions across its portfolio, and high-margin aftermarket exposure provide a durable foundation for long-term growth.

  • Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) – CSCO was a top performer this quarter following a beat and raise, driven by strong Networking growth and accelerating AI momentum. Strength in core Networking more than offsets near-term weakness in Security, which is transitioning toward a more recurring revenue model. Early signs of a campus refresh cycle were also positive. We think that the company’s leadership position in Networking, product breadth, and balance sheet flexibility will continue to drive growth and shareholder value over time.

  • Corning Inc. (GLW) – Once again, GLW outperformed during the quarter, driven by strong demand in Optical Communications, particularly GenAI-related products. Increasing data speed and bandwidth requirements, both inside and outside data centers, are boosting demand. The uptick in topline has driven meaningful operating leverage. We believe GLW’s diversified portfolio of innovative, value-added products is well-positioned to capitalize on secular growth trends.

 

Top 3 Detractors from Relative Performance 

  • Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR (NTDOY) – After a strong start, NTDOY was a bottom performer this quarter due to volatility at the beginning of the console cycles and rising cost due to external factors, as the cost of memory chips has increased. All of these are short term rather than any deterioration in the underlying business. The market is underappreciating NTDOY’s evolving platform. There are external offsets to rising costs. We remain attracted to NTDOY’s integrated hardware-software model, brand franchises, and the strength of its balance sheet.

  • Fastenal Company (FAST) – FAST underperformed during the quarter as elevated expectations reset and industrial demand recovered more slowly than expected. Sales growth from new customer sites remained. Strong cash generation, a healthy balance sheet, and disciplined capital allocation continue to provide downside support.

  • BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) – BLK was a bottom performer during the quarter as investor sentiment was pressured by concerns around private market liquidity, return durability, and higher expenses tied to recent acquisitions. Despite this, fundamentals remain solid, with record AUM, healthy flows, and organic base fee growth well above long-term targets, driven by active ETFs, digital assets, and alternatives. We continue to view BLK as a long-term share gainer, and we appreciate the strong balance sheet and steady capital return.

 

Sector Influence

We are bottom-up stock pickers, but sector exposures influenced relative performance as follows:

  • What Helped: Overweight Information Technology (a better performing sector) & underweight Real Estate (a weaker performing sector)

  • What Hurt: Underweight in both Health Care and Communication Services (better performing sectors)

 

Trades During the Quarter

  • There were no trades this quarter.

 

Looking Ahead

As we move into 2026, the economic and policy backdrop remains characterized by a mix of support and uncertainty. On the positive side, corporate earnings trends have remained better than expected, consumer activity has shown resilience, and ongoing Fed rate cuts combined with fiscal stimulus measures may continue to support growth. At the same time, late-cycle dynamics are becoming more evident. Labor market softening, affordability pressures, and persistent housing weakness underscore the uneven nature of growth. Trade and tariff policy remain fluid, and elevated complacency leaves markets vulnerable to adverse surprises. Against this backdrop, economic and inflation data may remain volatile, increasing the likelihood of episodic market dislocations. Despite resilient earnings trends and elevated hyperscaler capital spending, we believe caution is prudent given these crosscurrents.

From an equity market perspective, strong headline returns have masked growing dispersion beneath the surface. Leadership has remained narrow and valuation risk increasingly concentrated, raising the possibility that company-specific risks could take on broader significance. Periodic risk-on rallies, particularly among high-beta and lower-quality segments, have contributed meaningfully to recent performance, but history suggests such episodes are rarely durable. We believe the environment is becoming more conducive to broader leadership and a return to fundamentals, where earnings growth, dividends, and balance-sheet strength matter more than valuation multiple expansion. As volatility rises, downside protection is likely to be driven by companies with high and stable returns on invested capital, conservative leverage, and reasonable valuations. Our portfolios remain anchored in these attributes, which we believe offer a more resilient path through shifting market regimes and help clients participate in long-term wealth creation while managing downside risk.

 

Annualized Returns 

As of 12/31/2025

Income Equity - 4Q2025 vs R1000V Annualized Returns

Inception date: 12/31/1999. Performance is preliminary. Subject to change. Past performance should not be taken as a guarantee of future results. Net of fee returns are calculated net of an annual model management fee of 0.75%. Please see the disclosure notes found on the bottom of the page.

Connect

Get in touch with us to get started on your journey

Contact Us

Disclosure Notes

 

The London Company’s performances are size weighted and annualized based on calculations for the period ending December 31, 2025. The characteristics discussed herein relate to a representative account, and not every client’s account will have these exact characteristics. As London manages its client portfolios according to each client’s specific investment needs and circumstances, London cannot affirm that the characteristics of the account shown are similar to all accounts participating in the strategy. This is due in part to the timing of trades by the Advisor, market conditions, cash availability, and the timing of client deposits and withdrawals. Therefore, prospective clients should not assume that similar performance results to those shown would have been achieved for their accounts had they been invested in the strategy during the period. None of the information contained herein should be construed as an offer to buy or sell securities, or as investment recommendations.

 

Definition of Firm: The London Company of Virginia is a registered investment advisor. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about the advisor, including full descriptions of its investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in the firm’s Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request by calling 804.775.0317 or visiting www.TLCadvisory.com. The London Company claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®). GIPS® is a registered trademark of CFA Institute. CFA Institute does not endorse or promote this organization, nor does it warrant the accuracy or quality of the content contained herein. Please visit www.TLCadvisory.com or contact us at 804.775.0317 to request a complete list and description of The London Company’s composites and/or a GIPS® Report that adheres to the (GIPS®) standards.

 

Composite Creation/Inception Date: December 31, 1999

 

Composite Definition: The Income Equity strategy invests mainly in common equities with a focus on higher overall dividend yield orientation, which may be supplemented with primarily investment grade, preferred equities. This strategy has a more conservative orientation, with a focus on capital preservation, income and growth, in order to provide greater yield and downside protection relative to our Large and Mid Cap strategies. Our Income Equity strategy is designed to generate above-average, absolute returns over full market cycles. Accounts in this product composite are fully discretionary taxable and tax-exempt portfolios with no minimum dollar amount of assets. The product is measured against the Russell 1000 Value Index and has a creation and inception date of December 31, 1999. There is no use of leverage, derivatives or short positions. All actual fee-paying discretionary portfolios are included in one or more composites that have been managed for a full calendar quarter with limited restrictions and similar objectives. As of July 1, 2022 The London Company redefined the composites to exclude all dual contract relationships and any potentially bundled fee scenarios. This policy is not retroactive, but will continue to apply going forward.

 

Benchmark Description: The Russell 1000 Value Index measures the performance of the large-cap value segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values. Benchmark returns are not covered by the report of independent verifiers.

 

Performance and Fees: Gross of fee returns are calculated gross of management and custodian fees and net of transaction costs. Net of fee returns are calculated net of an annual model fee of 0.75% and transaction cost and gross of custodian and other fees. The 0.75% model London Company management fee applied is the highest tier of the current composite fee schedule. This fee is applied monthly to the gross return at 1/12th the annual rate, which is 0.0625% per month. Actual investment advisory fees incurred by clients may vary. Net of fee returns prior to January 1, 2009 are calculated net of actual London Company management fees and transaction costs and gross of custodian and other fees. Some of the accounts in this composite pay a bundled fee, which includes custodian, consultant and management fees. Because of this fee arrangement, composite actual net of fee returns prior to January 1, 2009, could have an undervalued net performance. Returns may be net of miscellaneous fund expenses. The gross figures do not reflect the deduction of investment advisory fees. Returns are calculated and stated in U.S. dollars. Prior to April 1, 2024 returns are calculated gross of withholding taxes on foreign dividends and interest. Starting April 1, 2024, performance is calculated net or gross of foreign withholding taxes on dividends and interest income, dependent on custodian data. Dividends are reinvested. Policies for valuing investments, calculating performance, and preparing GIPS Reports are available upon request.

 

Past performance should not be taken as a guarantee of future results. The report is for informational purposes only. Data, while obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, cannot be guaranteed and all statistics are subject to change. The statements contained herein are solely based upon the opinions of The London Company and the data available at the time of publication of this report, and there is no assurance that any predicted results will actually occur. Information was obtained from third-party sources, which we believe to be reliable but are not guaranteed as to their accuracy or completeness. This report contains no recommendations to buy or sell any specific securities and should not be considered investment advice of any kind. An investment in a London Company strategy is subject to risks, including the loss of principal. Referenced strategies may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of a particular strategy will depend on individual circumstances and objectives. In making an investment decision, individuals should utilize other information sources and the advice of their investment advisor.

You are now leaving The London Company’s website. The link below is provided as a convenience, and The London Company is not responsible for the content provided on the destination site.

Continue

By continuing on this site or clicking Yes to Accept, you agree to our use of cookies and other technologies to process your personal data to personalize your experience and for other purposes.