Skip to main content

QTD Income Equity – 4Q2023 vs R1000V


Market Observations & Portfolio Commentary

Income Equity – 4Q2023 vs R1000V

 

Market Update

U.S. equities rallied during 4Q with the major indices posting double-digit returns. Moderating inflation, some weakening in the labor market, and slowing economic growth raised the odds of a soft landing. The easing of financial conditions combined with indications by the Federal Reserve that it would pivot to rate cuts later in 2024 set forth a positive feedback loop for risk assets in 4Q. For the quarter, the Russell 3000 Index rose 12.1%.

There was a notable broadening of market strength in 4Q, as Small and Mid-Cap stocks posted the strongest gains. The recent broadening out of the market was a welcome reprieve, yet the cap-weighted Large Cap indices remain historically top-heavy and the mega-cap Magnificent 7 (Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, NVIDIA, Alphabet, Tesla, & Meta Platforms) were dominant in 2023. Some of the biggest beneficiaries of the 4Q drop in yields were the biggest victims of the rise in yields: regional banks, property stocks, cyclical sectors, and low quality, highly levered companies. Looking at market factors, Volatility and Growth were positive in 4Q while Value and Yield factors were mixed. Quality and Momentum factors were the biggest detractors during the final quarter.

 

Key Performance Takeaways

  • The London Company Income Equity portfolio gained 8.2% (8.1% net) during the quarter vs. a 9.5% increase in the Russell 1000 Value Index. Sector exposure was a tailwind, but was more than offset by headwinds from stock selection.

  • The Income Equity portfolio trailed its benchmark in 4Q, but finished in line with our goal of 85-90% upside capture. The portfolio faced headwinds from exposure to lower beta and higher Quality holdings as well as underexposure to Growth & Volatility factors. Although our Energy underweight was beneficial, the rise of GLP-1 weight loss drugs adversely impacted consumer staples stocks, in which we are overweight.

  • Our balance sheet strength value proposition proved to be more of a luxury than a necessity in 2023, but we believe that focus will become a tangible advantage in the years ahead, as we face an economic slowdown with a higher cost of capital environment. Longer term, we believe that the best drivers of equity returns are companies with sustainably high returns on capital, flexible balance sheets, and consistent cash flow generation.

 

Top 3 Contributors to Relative Performance 

  • BlackRock (BLK) – BLK rallied in 4Q after underperforming earlier in the year. BLK performance from quarter to quarter is often a function of market performance, which drives the company’s assets under management. Our conviction in BLK remains high based on the company’s durable competitive position, under-levered balance sheet, persistently strong profitability, and capital return.

  • Charles Schwab (SCHW) – SCHW posted growth in net assets, with some of the headwinds around the TD integration clearing. We believe SCHW is well positioned to show a sharp rebound in 2024 and 2025 earnings as near-term issues resolve naturally. We continue to like SCHW’s strong competitive position, growth outlook, high incremental margins, and excellent management team.

  • Norfolk Southern (NSC) – NSC rebounded in 4Q after hitting a three-year low in late October. NSC reported a strong earnings report, provided more visibility into the Ohio derailment and suggested pricing power remains solid, and will be evident going forward to offset inflationary pressures.

 

Top 3 Detractors from Relative Performance 

  • Air Products & Chemicals (APD) – APD came under pressure in 4Q due to weakening industrial production in the Asia/Pacific region as well as fears of inflation affecting the cost of megaprojects. At this point, the majority of APD’s project pipeline has been de-risked with updated project costs and these investments are all expected to achieve return thresholds >10%. CEO Seifi Ghasemi purchased >$5M worth of stock in November on a pullback in the stock price.

  • Chevron (CVX) – CVX underperformed during 4Q as oil prices fell, 3Q results missed expectations, and CVX negatively adjusted 2024-2025 cash flow guidance for its key asset in Kazakhstan. It is also notable that CVX announced a deal to acquire Hess Corp in a stock-for-stock transaction. While we generally do not maintain a high degree of exposure to pure commodity businesses, we continue to view CVX favorably for its conservative balance sheet, focus on returns, and commitment to the dividend.

  • Diageo (DEO) – DEO underperformed during 4Q after it reduced its guidance due to softer demand trends and higher reinvestment needs. In Latin America, there’s been unanticipated destocking and a weaker macro environment is driving consumers to trade down to cheaper products. The important U.S. market has been slow to rebound but management is prioritizing marketing investments to support profitable growth. Overall, we believe DEO’s leading portfolio of brands across key categories and regions gives the company an entrenched position in the attractive spirits industry.

 

Sector Influence

We are bottom-up stock pickers, but sector exposures influenced relative performance as follows:

  • What Helped: Underweight Energy (a weaker performing sector) & overweight Info. Technology (a better performing sector)

  • What Hurt: Underweight Real Estate (a better performing sector) & overweight Cons. Staples (a weaker performing sector)

 

Trades During the Quarter

  • There were no trades during the quarter.

 

Looking Ahead

After such a strong 2023, we believe investors should temper expectations for 2024. Stocks defied rate hikes, wars, collapsed banks, and recession fears in 2023. Now, calls for a soft landing are consensus; sentiment is overly optimistic; and markets are priced for very little risk. Predicting the future direction of the economy is always challenging. While we do agree the odds of a recession have come down, they are still elevated. A soft landing remains in reach, but much of that hinges on whether the Fed eases soon enough to avoid an employment problem. Perhaps this time it will be different, but historically the odds of sticking the landing have been very low. Even though we have greater clarity over the Fed’s path from here, there still remains a long list of items creating uncertainty that could lead to greater volatility in 2024.

In terms of the equity market, we believe returns in the near term may be modest, with shareholder yield (dividends, share repurchase, debt reduction) comprising a significant percentage of the total return. Economic growth is likely to slow; earnings estimates appear optimistic; and valuations are somewhat elevated. Moreover, investors continue to expect a faster pace of rate cuts than members of the FOMC currently suggest. The difference in the pace of rate reductions could lead to greater levels of volatility in 2024. Markets are impossible to outguess in the short run, but we believe the antidote to uncertainty is quality and that solid company fundamentals will lead to strong risk-adjusted returns in the long run. With that in mind, the characteristics of our portfolios remain attractive, and we believe we’re well positioned for an uncertain future.

 

Markets are impossible to outguess in the short run, but we believe the antidote to uncertainty is quality and that solid company fundamentals will lead to strong risk-adjusted returns in the long run.

Annualized Returns 

As of 12/31/2023

Income Equity - 2023 vs R1000 Annualized Returns

Inception date: 12/31/1999. Past performance should not be taken as a guarantee of future results. Performance is preliminary. Subject to change.

You are now leaving The London Company’s website. The link below is provided as a convenience, and The London Company is not responsible for the content provided on the destination site.

Continue