Market Observations & Portfolio Commentary
Income Equity – 3Q2026 vs Russell 1000 Value
Market Update
U.S. equities were mixed in the third quarter, with modest index gains but weak participation beneath the surface. The Russell 3000 returned 1.4%, but the average S&P 500 stock declined and Small Caps fell sharply. Strong earnings and improving PMIs supported Large Caps, while the breakdown of U.S.-Iran peace efforts sent oil sharply higher and reignited inflation concerns. The Fed raised rates 25 basis points in September, its first hike since 2023. Treasury yields rose across the curve, with the 10-year at its highest level since 2002. Higher oil and rates compressed valuations and weighed on consumer confidence.
Equity leadership shifted sharply during the quarter. The high-beta and the momentum rally that peaked in late June reversed, and Large Caps were the only size segment to post gains as the Russell 2000 fell 7.2%. Breadth was weak, with the Equal-Weight S&P 500 trailing its cap-weighted counterpart by more than four percentage points. Energy led all sectors as oil surged, and Technology advanced as a software rebound offset weakness in semiconductors. Utilities and Industrials lagged. From a factor perspective, Value, Quality, Size and Yield were all positive. Momentum and Volatility were negative, while Growth factors were mixed.
Key Performance Takeaways
-
The London Company Income Equity portfolio declined 3.4% (-3.6% net) during the quarter vs. a 2.6% increase in the Russell 1000 Value Index. Both stock selection and sector allocation were headwinds to relative performance.
-
The Income Equity portfolio declined in Q3 while the Russell 1000 Value advanced, falling short of our 85–90% upside capture expectations. Declines in AI-adjacent industrial tech hit some of our recent strong performers. Meanwhile, much of the shortfall reflects unfortunate reconstitution timing rather than any shift in our approach. We missed the parabolic first-half rally in cyclical memory & semi-equipment names before the June reconstitution removed that exposure from the index, then saw no offsetting benefit when those names sharply sold off in Q3. Moreover, the Value index’s new mega-cap tech exposure experienced a resurgence during the quarter, which added further headwinds. The benchmark changed; our process did not. We believe our consistent, differentiated approach grows more valuable as the Value index takes on more growth and technology exposure than its label suggests.
Top 3 Contributors to Relative Performance
-
Chevron Corporation (CVX) – CVX was a top contributor as oil prices rebounded on the unresolved conflict in the Middle East and quarterly results beat expectations on stronger downstream profits. While commodity prices are elevated and outside management’s control, we continue to appreciate CVX’s disciplined capital allocation, improved prospects for long-term production growth, operational efficiency, and commitment to shareholder returns.
-
Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR (NTDOY) – NTDOY outperformed as quarterly results came in well ahead of expectations, with demand holding up better than feared despite higher console prices and memory costs. Software sales, which matter most for profitability, were particularly strong. We continue to believe long-term value will be driven by software, digital monetization, and its intellectual property ecosystem, while its large cash balance provides downside protection.
-
BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) – BLK was a top contributor after reporting record revenue and earnings, supported by strong inflows into its ETFs and growth in its technology services business. We remain confident BLK’s diversified platform, strong organic asset growth, and expanding margins position the company for durable long-term earnings growth.
Top 3 Detractors from Relative Performance
-
Corning Inc. (GLW) – GLW detracted as shares pulled back after a strong run despite another solid quarter. Investors were looking for a larger outlook increase, while Optical Communications continued to accelerate on AI and data center demand and the company added new supply agreements. We remain confident in GLW’s technology leadership, pricing power, and ability to benefit from higher-growth connectivity demand.
-
Cummins Inc. (CMI) – CMI declined after earnings came in slightly below elevated expectations despite record revenue and a higher full-year outlook. Tariffs, freight, and new product investment weighed on margins. We remain confident in its data center power leadership, record backlog, and disciplined capital allocation.
-
Dominion Energy Inc. (D) – D declined as higher interest rates compressed valuations across the sector and regulatory noise surrounding the pending NextEra merger added pressure. The thesis remains intact, supported by offshore wind completion, regulated rate base growth, and strong Virginia data center demand. We remain confident in D’s attractive dividend and steady earnings growth.
Sector Influence
We are bottom-up stock pickers, but sector exposures influenced relative performance as follows:
-
What Helped: Overweight Information Technology (a better performing sector) & underweight Real Estate (a weaker performing sector)
-
What Hurt: Overweight Industrials (a weaker performing sector) & underweight Health Care (a better performing sector)
Trades During the Quarter
-
Initiated: Alphabet Inc. 6.25% Series A Conv PFD (GOOGM) & Alphabet Inc. 6.25% Series B Conv PFD (GOOGN) – Alphabet, Google’s parent company, is a company we know well and have owned in our Large Cap portfolio for many years. Its core businesses across Search, Cloud, and YouTube continue to deliver strong results, and AI-embedded monetization is increasingly real. The company is positioned across every layer of the AI stack — from custom silicon chips and in-house research labs, to Google Cloud’s infrastructure, to the world’s largest distribution channels in Search and Android. We have confidence in its competitive moat, strong operating margins, and high returns on invested capital. Rather than buying common stock, which pays a negligible dividend, we initiated positions in the company’s convertible preferred shares (GOOGM/GOOGN), issued as part of the company’s AI infrastructure capital raise. The mandatory convertible preferreds provide an opportunity to gain exposure to the company while generating an attractive yield of approximately 6.25%, with the securities guaranteed to convert into common stock in approximately three years.
-
Reduced: Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) – Trimmed following recent strength and to manage position sizing. CSCO continues to benefit from improving enterprise networking demand, AI infrastructure investment, and expanding software and security offerings. We still maintain conviction in the long-term investment thesis.
-
Exited: Crown Castle, Inc. (CCI) – Sold to reallocate capital to higher-conviction ideas. The core tower business continued to generate sustainable, recurring revenue from long-term carrier leases, but near-term earnings growth was muted by slower carrier capex spending. The DISH-related noise and increased potential competition from newer technology also lowered our confidence in the outlook. Given it was a smaller position and we did not have conviction to add to the name, we elected to exit.
Looking Ahead
The economic backdrop remains supportive in many respects. Growth is solid, manufacturing and services activity are improving, and corporate earnings continue to exceed elevated expectations. At the same time, the headwinds have grown more pronounced. The Fed has begun tightening, energy prices and Treasury yields are elevated, and higher borrowing and living costs are weighing on consumers, particularly at the lower end of the income spectrum. The AI investment cycle remains a powerful engine of growth. Yet, its scale invites comparisons to past infrastructure booms, where investors who were right about the buildout still endured significant drawdowns along the way. Early signs of stress have also emerged in the lowest tiers of credit. While we do not attempt to predict the path of rates or the economy, we believe these crosscurrents argue for discipline.
From an equity market perspective, headline index strength continues to mask a narrower reality. A concentrated group of AI-linked companies has driven a disproportionate share of returns, while many stocks have moved independently of, or opposite to, the index. Passive flows have reinforced that concentration, and benchmarks once considered defensive now carry more technology exposure and higher beta than their labels suggest. Quality has historically lagged when rates rise, but if higher rates begin to pressure corporate balance sheets, the attributes we emphasize should matter more: strong returns on capital, conservative leverage, durable dividends, and reasonable valuations. We view these attributes as important ballast and a complement to more concentrated growth exposures. We remain confident that our portfolios are well positioned to participate as fundamentals reassert themselves while helping to manage downside risk.
Annualized Returns
As of 9/30/2026

Inception date: 12/31/1999. Performance is preliminary. Subject to change. Past performance should not be taken as a guarantee of future results. Net of fee returns are calculated net of an annual model management fee of 0.75%. Please see the disclosure notes found on the bottom of the page.