Skip to main content

QTD SMID Cap – 2Q2026 vs. R2500


Market Observations & Portfolio Commentary

SMID Cap – 2Q2026 vs. Russell 2500

 

Market Update

 

U.S. equities staged a reversal in Q2, with the Russell 3000 Index gaining 15.4% and the S&P 500 posting its strongest quarter since 2020. The rally was fueled by AI infrastructure spending and an earnings season that beat expectations, overcoming early-quarter anxiety over the Middle East conflict. Momentum built in late June after the U.S.-Iran peace deal eased oil prices and gave rates room to retreat. Headwinds included a hawkish shift in Fed expectations toward a hike, and a reversal in Energy after a solid start to the year. The quarter reflected optimism around AI and earnings colliding with an uncertain rate outlook.

Equity leadership shifted beneath the headline rally. Technology, the weakest sector to start the year, surged to lead the market as the only sector to outperform the S&P 500, driven by a historic rebound in semiconductors. Energy was the worst performer as oil prices retreated, while defensive sectors, including Utilities and Consumer Staples, also declined. Small caps outpaced large caps despite AI-driven leadership at the top. Momentum and Volatility factors led, Value and Growth were mixed, and Quality and Yield, areas our portfolios tilt toward, were headwinds.

 

Key Performance Takeaways

  • The London Company Small-Mid Cap portfolio returned 12.1% (11.8% net) during the quarter vs. a 20.3% increase in the Russell 2500 Index. Stock selection was a headwind to performance, partially offset by sector allocation.

  • The SMID portfolio produced strong absolute returns in Q2 but fell short of our 85–90% upside capture expectations relative to the Russell 2500. Strength was concentrated in high-beta and high-volatility names — the top beta quintile returned nearly 66% and drove more than half the index’s gain — while Quality was among the weakest factors, making our sizable underweight to that cohort a significant headwind. Only the Technology sector outperformed the index in Q2, and just 25% of profitable Russell 2500 companies beat the benchmark—a reminder that this rally rewarded momentum over fundamentals. Relative performance improved sharply in June as participation began to widen, and we remain confident that our focus on durable, high-quality businesses positions the portfolio to compound attractively over full cycles.

 

Top 3 Contributors to Relative Performance 

  • Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) – ENTG was a top contributor, benefiting from improving semiconductor demand, accelerating AI investment, and rising fab utilization. Beyond the industry recovery, management outlined a clear path to structurally higher earnings through manufacturing optimization, improved working capital, and rebuilding the operating model over time. We remain attracted to ENTG’s strong competitive position, high barriers to entry, and long runway for free cash flow expansion.

  • Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) – CACC outperformed following signs of improving credit performance, while lower fuel prices eased concerns surrounding subprime borrowers. Credit trends continue to improve, and the company remains disciplined in repurchasing shares. We believe the investment thesis remains on track as fundamentals continue to strengthen.

  • Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) – QLYS was a top contributor as investor sentiment improved across the cybersecurity sector. While concerns around AI disruption weighed on the group earlier this year, AI is increasingly viewed as strengthening demand for cybersecurity solutions. We continue to view QLYS as a high-quality business with a durable competitive position, supported by its expanding platform and strong product strategy.

 

Top 3 Detractors from Relative Performance 

  • White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd (WTM) – WTM lagged during an otherwise uneventful quarter following strong prior-period performance driven by the Bamboo transaction. The shares also benefited less from the broader market rebound after proving relatively defensive earlier in the year. We remain confident in management’s disciplined capital allocation and ability to compound book value per share over the long term.

  • Marzetti, Co. (MZTI) – MZTI declined as weaker-than-expected retail volumes weighed on results. We believe these pressures are temporary, as the company’s core brands continue to gain market share and upcoming product launches should support improving volumes. We remain confident that margin expansion will continue through productivity initiatives, while the Bachan’s acquisition and portfolio optimization further strengthen the company’s long-term earnings growth.

  • Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) – CHDN declined despite solid operating results as Derby Week growth fell slightly short of elevated investor expectations. The business continues to execute well, supported by strong Historical Racing Machine growth, improving leverage, and healthy cash flow generation. We believe the recent weakness is disconnected from the underlying fundamentals and remain confident in the company’s ability to compound earnings through disciplined capital allocation, pricing power, and continued investment in its differentiated gaming and racing assets.

 

Sector Influence

We are bottom-up stock pickers, but sector exposures influenced relative performance as follows:

  • What Helped: Underweight Energy & Utilities (weaker performing sectors)

  • What Hurt: Overweight Consumer Staples & Consumer Discretionary (weaker performing sectors)

 

Trades During the Quarter

  • There were no trades this quarter.

Looking Ahead

Our outlook remains broadly constructive, supported by a healthy earnings backdrop, resilient economic data, and the prospect of meaningful long-term productivity gains from artificial intelligence. That said, headwinds facing today’s market leadership are accumulating in ways we believe matter. The AI capex boom is real but increasingly fragile, as free cash flow at several hyperscalers has turned negative even as their share prices continue to compound. Geopolitical and tariff conditions remain fluid, and further Fed rate cuts may prove difficult against stubbornly sticky inflation, low unemployment, and resilient economic activity. Layered on top of historic index concentration and valuations requiring near-flawless execution, the cumulative case for discipline is hard to ignore.

From an equity market perspective, broadening at the large-cap index level has masked a narrower reality beneath the surface, with leadership rotating between concentrated energy and AI-related technology bets accompanied by significant speculation. Complicating this picture, June’s Russell reconstitution meaningfully reshuffled index composition across styles and down the cap spectrum, with semiconductor exposure in growth benchmarks rising from roughly twice that of value benchmarks to more than ten times over. With trillions benchmarked to these indices, investors who believe they hold a diversified mix of strategies may find their actual exposures have shifted considerably. History suggests periods of high-beta, lower-quality outperformance are prone to mean reversion, a dynamic that has often served as a tailwind to our approach. With valuations and earnings expectations elevated and dividend yields near multi-decade lows, we believe it is prudent to expect more modest equity returns ahead. Against this backdrop, our approach, anchored in quality, high active share, and sources of downside protection, can serve as important ballast and a valuable diversifier for portfolios going forward.

 

Annualized Returns 

As of 6/30/2026

SMID Cap - 2Q2026 vs. R2500 Annualized Returns

Inception date: 3/31/2009. Performance is preliminary. Subject to change. Past performance should not be taken as a guarantee of future results. Net of fee returns are calculated net of an annual model management fee of 1.00%. Please see the disclosure notes found on the bottom of the page.

You are now leaving The London Company’s website. The link below is provided as a convenience, and The London Company is not responsible for the content provided on the destination site.

Continue